Perceptions On Self-Financed Medical Institutes Among Recent Medical Graduates

Authors

  • Vinesh Shah SMIMER, Surat
  • Kanan T. Desai SMIMER, Surat
  • Ravi A Jariwala Udhana Urban Health Center, Surat
  • Danish B Kanpurwala Dumaswala Hospital, Surat
  • RK Bansal SMIMER, Surat

Keywords:

Medical graduates, self finance, medical institute, perceptions

Abstract

Background: The issue of high fee payment/Non Residential Indian quota seats and private sector involvement in medical education has drawn a lot of flak from the ethicist in India.

Aim: The current study was planned with an aim to explore the perceptions of the recent medical graduates/graduating students of private medical college on self financed medical institutes.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study comprising of personal interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire among 400 recent medical graduates of Surat Municipal Institute of Medical Education and Research. Data analysis was done with help of Epi Info 7.

Results: Exactly half 200 (50%) of the respondents were against seeking admission in a self financed institution (Table 1). Almost twice the number of males as compared to females had opined in favor of seeking admission in self financed colleges. Major reason to seek admission in self finance institute given by one third students was that they were clever students who failed to score in their admission examinations, hence has to take admission in the payment medical college.

Conclusion: Fresh graduates of private medical institute face a very difficult situation after M.B.B.S, as after years of hard work, they face a gloomy prospect, as a result of a need to recuperate the mammoth amounts of capital invested in private medical colleges.

References

Bhalerao RA. We need to invest in our teaching hospitals. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2002 October-December; 10 (4). Available from: http://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/104il096.html.

Supe AN. A teacher’s perception about education of ethics in medicine. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 1998 July-September; 6 (3). Available from: http://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/063di079.html.

Mehta L. Ethical basis for charging medical fees. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2000; 8 (2). Available from: http://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/082or049.html.

Rao BC. Unholy nexuses in general medical practice. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2002; 10 (2).Available from: http://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/102di009.html Dhar A. Rural posting for doctors finalized. Hindu 2007 Jul 1. Available from: www.thehindu.com/2007/07/01/stories/2007070156441000.htm.

Bansal RK. Judicial activism in establishing the right to health care in India. In: Peters G.A., Peters B.J. Eds. Sourcebook on Asbestos Diseases. Charlottesville: Lexis-Reed Elsevier, 1998; 18:53-92.

Bansal RK. Private medical education takes off in India. Lancet 2003; 361 (9370): 1748 -9.

Udwadia FE. Ethical problems in medical education. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 1997; 5 (2).Available from: http://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/052ed037.html.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Shah V, Desai KT, Jariwala RA, Kanpurwala DB, Bansal R. Perceptions On Self-Financed Medical Institutes Among Recent Medical Graduates. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2012 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 May 3];3(04):725-7. Available from: https://www.njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/1804

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles