Breast Or Cervical Cancer Screening Programme: Which One Needs to Stress in Changing Trend? Why?

Authors

  • Hemali J Tailor Government Medical College, Surat
  • Mandakini M Patel Government Medical College, Surat
  • Sonal L Italiya Government Medical College, Surat

Keywords:

Breast cancer, cervix cancer, cancer screening, time trends

Abstract

Background: In India the cervix cancer rates are decreasing while breast cancer is on the increase and is likely to continue due to further changes in lifestyle factors. Early detection of breast carcinoma by complete breast examination or mammography helps in significant reduction in mortality.

Methods The authors have carried out a retrospective study in a tertiary care hospital in Surat by collecting breast cytology and histopathology data of 159 and180 patients respectively as well as Pap smear data and cervix histopathology data of 3136 and 804 patients respectively.  And finally we have analyzed both the data for calculating the percentage incidence of both type of malignancy in women of different age groups.

Result: Breast cytology data and biopsy data show malignancy in 41.51% and 60% of cases respectively and in Pap smear screening and cervix histopathology data show malignant features in only 0.1% and 24.13% cases respectively with maximum number of cases were in age group of 41-50 years.

Interpretation & conclusions: Total percentage of breast malignancy is significantly higher as compared to cervix malignancy which suggests need for emphasis on screening for breast malignancy along with Pap smear. India is at a crossroads and needs urgent steps to introduce appropriate screening methods to reduce breast cancer presentations in late stages and reduce mortality.

References

National Cancer Registry Programme – Consolidated Report ofthe Population Based Cancer Registries – (2001-2004)-December-2006.

RamnathTakiar, AtulSrivastav:Time Trends in Breast and Cervix Cancer of Women in India - 1990-2003;Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev: 9: 777-780.

YeoleBB,KurkureAP: An epidemiological assessment of increasing incidence and trends in breast cancer in Mumbai and other sites in India, during the last two decades:Asian Pac J CancerPrev . 2003; 4 ( 1 ): 51 – 56.

ChopraR: The Indian scene: J ClinOncol2001 ; 19 ( 18 Supp1 ): 106 – 111.

Mittra I: Screening for breast cancer: is it globally appli-cable? Nat ClinPract Oncol.2008; 5 ( 2 ): 60 – 61.

Daniel S. May, Nancy C. Lee, Marion R. Nadel,Rosemarie M. Henson,Daniel S. Miller:The Na-tional Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Pro-gram: Report on the First 4 Years of Mammography Provided to Medically Underserved Women:AJR1998; 170:97-104.

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Cancer-Preventive Strategies. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Pre-vention: Breast Cancer Screening. Lyon, France: IARC Scientifi c Publications; 2002.

Saxena S, Rekhi B, Bansal A:Clinico-morphological patterns of breast cancer including family history in a New Delhi hospital, India-a cross-sectional study. World J SurgOncol 2005; 3: 67-75.

Claus EB, Rish N, Thomson WD: Age at onset as an indicator of familial risk of breast cancer. Am J Epi-demiol 1990; 131: 961-972.

Agarwal G, Ramakant P: Breast cancer care in India: the current scenario and the challenges for the future:Breast Care 2008; 3: 21-27.

Sue Moss: Screening for Breast Cancer in India — Is It An Appropriate Strategy? JNCI September 17, 2008; 100 (18) :1270-1271.

Ruby T. Senie, Martin Lesser,David W. Kinne, Paul Peter Rosen:Method of Tumor Detection InfluencesDisease-Free Survival of Women withBreast Carcinoma 1994; 73:1666-1672.

Jae Hong Lee,Diana Zuckerman: Screening for Breast Cancer with Mammography. Letter in The Lan-cet.January 2002;National Research Center for Women and Families.

Verdecchia A, Angelis GD, Capocaccia R: Estimation and projections of cancer prevalence from cancer registry data: statistics in medicine: Stat Med 2002; 21: 3511-3526.

Cancer Facts & Figures 2013

Laurie Barclay:More Evidence to Justify Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Lancet.2003; 361:1405-1417.

Gøtzsche PC, Olsen O: Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 2000; 355: 129-134.

Horton R.: Screening mammography--an overview revis-ited: Lancet 2001; 358: 1284-1285.

www.cochranelibrary.net.

International health news database- 2001

Stephen W. Duffy, Laszlo Tabar, Hsiu-Hsi Chen, MaritHolmqvist, Ming-Fang Yen, ShahimAbdsalah et al: The Impact of Organized Mammography Service Screening on Breast Carcinoma Mortality in Seven Swe-dish Counties: Cancer 2002;95:458–469.

Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ, Welch HG: Enthu-siasm for cancer screening in the United States: JAMA 2004;291:71-78.

Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, ZhengY,Weaver D, Cutter G:Detection of ductal carci-noma in situ in women undergoing screening mammog-raphy:JNatl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1546-1554.

Fadwa J Altaf:Cervical cancer screening with pattern of pap smear- review of multicentre study :Saudi Med J 2006; 27(10): 1498-1502.

Jamal AA, Al MaghrabiJA:Profile of pap smear cytolo-gy in the western region of Saudi Arabia:Saudi Med J 2003;24:1225-1229.

Swaminathan R, Selvakumaran R, Vinodha J:Education and cancer incidence in a rural population in south In-dia. Cancer Epidemiol 2009; 33, 89-93.

Breast cancer in India - Global Comparison

Downloads

Published

2016-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Tailor HJ, Patel MM, Italiya SL. Breast Or Cervical Cancer Screening Programme: Which One Needs to Stress in Changing Trend? Why?. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2016 Apr. 30 [cited 2024 May 16];7(04):338-42. Available from: https://www.njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/933

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles